Archive for February, 2010

Desperately Erasing Susan


2010
02.28

We return our readers to the curious case of Susan Powell, “missing” since early December when her strange husband, Josh, took the toddler boys on a midnight camping trip in sub-zero temperatures only to return home to an empty house where his vanished wife left her cell phone, purse and car.

Powell moved back to Washington state last month and has kept a low profile from press and law enforcement. However, his new neighbors decided to put up posters and purple ribbons to alert the community of the missing wife/mother. Now, whether they did this as a passive-aggressive reminder to Josh that they know who he is and are not about to let him forget it (which is the most likely scenario), or they sincerely believe hanging posters and ribbons will help find Susan, Powell and his dad didn’t take too kindly to the gesture:

Joshua Powell’s father on Friday said posters of his missing daughter-in-law plastered around his Washington state neighborhood this week are upsetting and confusing his two young grandchildren.

“Five-year-old Charlie did notice the flyers, and was concerned, asking why his mother’s picture was on all the signs,” said Steven Powell, father-in-law of Susan Powell, in an e-mail. “We have made every effort to shield the children from emotional trauma and will continue to do so.”

Meanwhile, in order to bolster the lame charade that he is grieving or concerned, Josh Powell published a website for Susan that is poorly designed, badly written, seriously creepy, and reminiscent of Cam Brown’s. It’s hard to believe a Y-Generation computer savvy geek like Josh would create such a gawd-awful website.

Followers of the Laci Peterson case will recall that Scott Peterson attempted to sell the couple’s house in Modesto, traded in Laci’s Rover, and moved out of the house and wandered from Berkeley to Bakersfield to San Diego to avoid police, the media and anyone who would recognize him.

Perhaps like Scott Peterson, Josh Powell is attempting to erase all traces of Susan’s existence, erase his old life, erase the past, and hope everyone just forgets all about it.

The Health Care Reform Summit


2010
02.25

Today I followed some live bloggers, video feed, Twitter feeds and updates on the health care reform summit between select members of Congress and the Prez and VP. After about 8 hours, not much was accomplished except demonstrating, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Republicans have no interest in negotiation, bipartisanship, or participating in shaping the health care bill. Their mission is single-minded: kill the bill.

Why do they want to kill the bill? Well, not for the reasons they state: because it would raise taxes or the cost of health care premiums or cut Medicare. No, they want it to fail because if a bill passes that is met with increased good will and satisfaction by the American people, the Republicans are doomed to sitting second chair for another eight or ten years.

Every Republican representative chirped talking points. None were willing to concede any salient point. None had any solutions besides “tort reform”; none could even frame the debate in real terms. It was simply pointless. Why Obama bothered, I’ll never know. It was as if he said, after giving the Republicans umpteen chances to come to the table with some solutions, “I’m going to give you one absolutely last, final chance, no do-overs, and then I’m going to follow through this time!!!” And, like a recalcitrant teenager whose parents always cave, the Republicans defied him again.

Hopefully, Obama is a tougher parent than president.

“An incremental approach is like a swimmer who’s 50 feet offshore drowning and you throw him a 10 foot rope. And you say, well, it didn’t reach him but we’ll get it back and we’ll throw him a 20 foot rope next time. Then we’ll throw him a 30 foot and a 40 — by that time, the swimmer has drowned.” — Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa

Is Mean the New Black?


2010
02.07

The Gorgon in Tights, of course, and her accolade on the right, Mean Girl, Amy Alkon.

*******

One of the blogs I read daily, Sadly, No! often introduces me to many right-wing columnists and bloggers I would otherwise never encounter. It helps me to learn how the other side thinks, and the wingnuts often provide great comedy fodder. The Sadly Naughts are like the Misfits used to be back in the Dibble Days. Ahh. Good times!

In one of his recent entries, Tintin at Sadly, No! wrote about a blogger/author, Amy Alkon, whose column I have read a few times and disregard as simply another vapid, mean-spirited, Coulter wannabe. Alkon is sort of the Kathy Griffin of Wingnut Mean (tacky, foul-mouthed, ADD, mostly stupid), but without being the least bit funny.

I made the careless error of posting a negative review on Amazon of Alkon’s book, I See Rude People, after reading about her overwrought reaction to one negative review on Sadly, No!. You can read excerpts of Alkon’s book on Amazon and Google Books. Essentially, it contains bullying, mean-spirited solutions to everyday rude encounters including tracking down telemarketers (who are just doing their jobs) and calling them at home to complain, stalking senior citizens and their families like an episode of “Dragnet” in order to prosecute them for scratching your car in a parking lot; and confronting people whose conversations you overhear in public places and ridiculing them. Fun stuff like that.

Alkon isn’t as mean or vile as her big sister, Ann Coulter, but her “research” is similarly narrow. She defends her behavior with pseudo-science from contributors to “Psychology Today” and various disparate articles from other mean people. The whole thing is simply ridiculous and I should have known better than to publicly offer my two cents.

Her reaction to my negative review and participation in the comment thread at Sadly, No! was to (in typical mutt fashion) post links to Muttville (from Googling my name) on her blog, and decry me as a horrible person trying to ruin her book sales/career. She managed to complain loudly enough for Amazon to delete most of the negative reviews, including mine. Wow! I wish I had that kind of clout at Amazon. She must know someone.

Not to be defeated that easily, I posted another review that I’m sure will stick. Meanwhile, Alkon was so flustered with the criticism and ridicule she was getting from Sadly, No! she spent the last three days, pretty much around the clock, attacking, defending, whining, hand-wringing, making frantic phone calls, no doubt sending frantic emails, posting comments on Amazon, and stalking and “outing” every negative reviewer.

It’s deja vu all over again!

If you visit “The Advice Goddess” blog, you will find many, many bigoted, mean, irresponsible, judgmental, and snarky posts. What you won’t find is anything funny. How this woman is billed as “comedy” is beyond me.

Among other deplorable and ignorant opinions, Alkon presumes to judge, rather harshly and consistently, single mothers and, in particular, single minority mothers with multiple children. Now, if Alkon had ever raised a child, I would give her opinions slightly more credence. Here is a never-married, childless woman insisting that (based on the statistics that more criminals come from single-parent homes than not, which are valid facts but not the entire story) women of any age who have children out-of-wedlock are selfish and should be condemned.

It’s opinions like these that give me pause as to the real motives of both Coulter and Alkon. Why would they have such loathing for single mothers? It’s surprising that Coulter and Alkon managed to avoid unplanned pregnancies in nearly half a century of femalehood. Either they are extremely infertile, lucky, still virgins, or terminated one or more inconvenient little “crotch fruit” (as Alkon so colorfully describes babies). As far as I’m concerned, the multiparas Alkon and Coulter berate are no more promiscuous than the Mean Girls; they just have more evidence.

There are many important issues about which to be passionate, but the bizarre campaign to vilify single mothers seems strange coming from barren women. I also find it very mean-spirited, unfair, and in many ways preposterous.

But, I guess Mean is the new Black.