Archive for November, 2009

A Movie a Day Keeps the Boredom Away


2009
11.30

moviereelMy internet pal, Cocktailhag, has a movie review up regarding 2012. Hag enjoyed the movie precisely because it was so ridiculous, predictable, and amusing in a likely unintended way.

Since I have been watching about a movie a day since May (on average, sometimes more), I felt inspired to list a few movies that are similar to Hag’s take on 2012 – movies I enjoyed despite (or perhaps because of) the ridiculous and unrealistic suspension of disbelief required by the audience to sell the premise; or, awful, eye-rolling dialogue that sounds as if it were written by a 29-year old kid who only recently moved out of his parent’s house (and probably was), or because the movie was supposed to be maudlin, sad, tragic, and serious and I, instead, irreverently laughed.

Category 1: Beyond Disbelief

“Unbreakable” with Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson: had me going along with it to some extent until the end when I said, “Oh, for crying out loud!” More loose ends than a cat-shredded afghan.

“Children of Men” with Clive Owen – an interesting premise (although too many unbelievably dodged bullets) but like a bad Stephen King novel, undeveloped rationale and pretty ridiculous outcome.

“Fracture” with Anthony Hopkins playing a brilliant murderer (typecast?) and Ryan Gosling an ambitious district attorney prosecuting the nearly perfect crime. The movie is clever and satisfying until the end when Hopkins’ character does something so stupid, you throw a Beannie Baby at the screen in disgust. If I were in the room with the writers, I would have insisted, “He wouldn’t do that!”

Category 2: Screenwriter(s) should be Flogged

“Lucky You” with Robert Duvall and Eric Bana: such potential, such an exciting and attractive subject (high-stakes poker), such a dog of a screenplay!

“Star Trek 2009″ where’s Gene Roddenberry when we need him?

“City of Angels” with Meg Ryan and Nick Cage – the script sounds like it was plagiarized from random  Hallmark Greeting Cards.

Category 3: Are You Serious?

“Valkyrie” – great story, terrible movie.

“Angels and Demons” – it’s another laughably absurd fantasy based on unreadable Dan Brown with Tom Hanks who should know better.

“The September Issue” – this is not billed as a comedy, but it’s very funny, perhaps by accident.

 

Murder by Cliffside – the Spousal Version


2009
11.25

Our friend, Denise Nix of The Daily Breeze reports of a murder trial involving an area quite familiar to Rendezvous readers (and misfits of yore), Rancho Palos Verdes. Read all about it at the link. Apparently, accused spousal murrrderer Brandon Manai, forgot one of the key rules of modern-day criminals: don’t use your cell phone during or after committing a crime if you intend for your alibi to stick.

The motive for the murder is unclear at this time. Had the victim, Julie Rosas, told her husband that she was pregnant, as is sometimes a ploy used to reel in wayward husbands? No indications of pregnancy are noted in the reports. Obviously, she wasn’t dressed for “hiking” at the time of her death, and there was no sign of a physical altercation prior to her fall. How did she get up there?  Was she brought to the cliff after being drugged? Traces of any substance (like GHB) would have disappeared by the time she was found. Her poor, grieving husband didn’t even report her missing for a couple of days and has a history of abusing women, according to an ex-girlfriend who is scheduled to testify.

Manai was sloppy and stupid, as is the case with most spouse murderers who inevitably get caught and sentenced to long prison stints, but why did he do it? There was no life insurance, no children from a previous relationship, no financial gain. We can only guess.

Why (Most) Women Dislike Sarah Palin


2009
11.24

SarahPalinNoIt’s a shame when a 21st century American woman of my generation attracts worldwide publicity, attention and political clout that it is someone like Sarah Palin. We girls came to age during the wave of feminism, suffered the backlash, bit our tongues and ate crow and endured a half century of underrepresentation only to be insulted by an incompetent, vapid sociopath. Just shoot me.

I’ve been reading around cyberspace about Sarah Palin’s “women problem” – a gender gap yawning wider now than in 1984 when it became a national issue during Reagan’s second election when Geraldine Ferraro was introduced as our first woman Vice Presidential nominee. The Republican party has never ably closed the gap, but with its enthusiastic endorsement of Palin as their female icon, the animosity most women feel toward any candidate with an “R” after his or her name is only going to get worse.

So, why do most women dislike Sarah Palin? It’s absolutely not, as men have accused, because we are jealous of her good looks and charm. I think Sarah is far prettier than the hideous and despicable Ann Coulter, but at least Ann can articulate her (hateful) opinions and string a comprehensible sentence together. No, we dislike Sarah because she embodies the absolute worst stereotypes of every working mother, incompetent female manager, and promoted underachiever we have met in our struggle to succeed.

Sarah is touted as a good mom, yet she abandoned her children to be raised by the village long ago when she ran for mayor of Wasilla. This may have been for the best, since she seems to be still a teenager herself, emotionally; nevertheless, she’s hardly the model of motherhood. She is praised for her morality, yet she has demonstrated the ultimate immorality: blaming others for her mistakes and failures, never mind her pathological dishonesty. She is glamorized as a hunter and athlete, yet according to people close to her she does not shoot and her “sport” of choice is mid-distance jogging. She’s paraded around as “everywoman” yet represents no woman I know. She has more money, more domestic help, more undeserved accolades, more vindictiveness, more personal drama, and more cosmetic enhancements than any woman I know from any middle-class neighborhood.

I don’t begrudge Sarah her wealth or her ability to flash her impressive gams, but I do question the wisdom of the Republican party (and the American media) in casting her as a role model for my daughters. She’s not a role model for my daughters. She’s everything I don’t want my daughters to be: shallow, uninformed, narcissistic, spiteful, dishonest, intellectually challenged, lazy, vain, culturally bereft, misogynist, jingoistic, fundamentalist, chauvinistic, spiritually vacuous, incurious, ignorant, inarticulate, and immature.

Despite her descent to innocuous domesticity as First Lady, Michelle Obama  is a far likelier role model for American girls than Sarah Palin could ever hope to be.

The Light at the end of Parenthood


2009
11.23

Parenting can often be a wretched, vexing, thankless job.

From the moment of conception until the day we are laid out in final impiety – surrounded by vapid, curdled chrysanthemums and hideous white hydrangeas, in the only unflattering navy blue outfit in our closet, our lifeless lips smeared with clashing flamingo pink (a color we swore to never be caught dead in), to the strains of mangled Andrew Lloyd Webber on an out of tune organ – we subject ourselves to endless humiliation, deprivation, exploitation, financial sacrifices, and drudgery.

During pregnancy we watch with horror our lovely, smooth, firm bodies balloon to freakish proportions, leaving an atlas of stretch marks from Madagascar to Terra del Fuego. We suffer nausea, heartburn, constipation, indescribable labor pains, staggering losses of modesty and blood, while complete strangers probe, sterilize, slice and suture our most sacred anatomy. The cherubic bundles of joy quickly transform into insatiable, selfish demons demanding every ounce of our energy and resources, outgrowing unworn clothing and unused toys faster than we can replace our tattered cotton underwear. Our intermittent sleep or languid lovemaking is interrupted by little bodies crawling into bed with us, melancholic moans of fever, fears of monsters under the bed, vomiting, ear infections, rashes, or other mysterious maladies. We spend the next eighteen years in a constant state of vigilance and scullery, slogging through diapers and dishes and muddy shoes, tripping over skateboards and trombone cases; cringing through “new math” and piano lessons and teacher conferences; white knuckling through drivers’ ed and first dates.

If we are crazy enough to ante up beyond their eighteenth birthday, we enlist into the uniquely suffering platoon of those who forfeit privacy, serenity, security, relaxation and retirement until our ungrateful, ever molting flock finally fly from the coop. Unfortunately, some parents by then have completely lost their sense of individuality and personality, and actually miss the prodigal brats even as they are writing a check to the utility company to keep their little beasties’ lights on.

I have only realized recently why intelligent, civilized, sophisticated people subject themselves to the indignities of parenthood: it’s because of the golden, exalted, beatific prospect of grandparenthood! My finicky son, who rejects an array of tasty offerings from his mother, considers his grandmother’s saltines a gourmet treat. He bends down at each flower in her garden, sniffing with wonder and appreciation, when just days before handed his mother some hastily plucked dandelions as a gift. The presents his mother gave him lay abandoned in the corner toy box, while he takes the Spiderman his grandmother gave him to bed at night. The moment he recognizes her street, he struggles to be unhitched from his seat, so he can leap from the car and run to the door in anticipation of Grandma’s greeting hug. Grandma can do no wrong. She makes the best cookies, the best soup, and has the best toys, even though they are thirty years old and he would sooner step on them than play with them in any other venue.

Yes, it is a rude, cruel job, this parenting gig. But at least I know what I can look forward to now that I’m a grandmother!

Anthony Sowell – And Then There Were 10


2009
11.03

sowellWe have our first serial killer in Cleveland since the unsolved “torso” murders back during the heyday of Untouchable Eliot Ness. While Ness never discovered the perp of the famous torso murders, not for lack of trying, the opposite situation exists with Anthony Sowell: we know who the murderer is, but Cleveland Police never even bothered to seriously investigate what is turning out to be (not surprisingly) numerous missing person reports, numerous complaints of alleged assault, rape and kidnapping by various local women, and numerous reports of putrid odors emanating from his house for the past two years.

What were they doing? Eating donuts? Writing traffic tickets? Chasing down dope dealers? Violent crime in Cleveland has decreased substantially in the last 10 years, similar to statistics around the country, and while the east side neighborhood where Sowell committed these blatant, in-your-face acts is not the worst or most dangerous neighborhood in town, why weren’t police more diligent? Was it because the victims are likely all African-American women, many who may have imbibed in some controlled substances from time to time? Was it because they routinely dismiss “missing person” reports, even regarding 31-year old mothers who have no record of disappearing? Is it because they don’t give a damn? Maybe the issue is not race but rather socioeconomics. There’s no money in investigating missing persons; just lots of paperwork and interviewing the neighbors. God forbid you do your jobs to “serve and protect” there, boys.

Some angry (and becoming even more outraged as the body count grows) neighbors are accusing the CPD of negligence, indifference and incompetence, especially now that the victim count is up to 10. The mayoral election is today, so the mayor may have dodged a bullet, but the police chief has some ’splainin’ to do. Especially when we read that it took “several weeks” to obtain a search warrant after the most recent (September 22) accusation of assault and rape was reported on Sowell.

Several weeks? Heck, we know from watching “Law and Order” that you can get a search warrant in an hour. Every judge in Cleveland would have signed one after reading Sowell’s arrest record and knowing he was released in 2005 from a 15-year stint for rape. This is preposterous. The entire staff of the local precinct should be fired.

This story has reached the worldwide press; even the NYT has an article today.